![]() | |||
| Volume 8, No. 1 | A Publication of the State Bar of Arizona - January 06, 2009 | ||
Q: Do I have a duty to communicate with my criminal-defense client's family and friends? A: No. Read Ethics Op. 07-01.
Creative Arts Competition www.myazbar.org
www.azbar.org Disclaimer | About eLegal | Feedback Copyright 2008 State Bar of Arizona |
Reeling from soured loans originated during the peak of the housing market, regional and national banks are turning to asset consultants to salvage thousands of reclaimed properties throughout the Valley. Read more. Spring 2009 Events Announced by the James E. Rogers College of Law An impressive line-up of events, including a lecture by John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, is open for registration. Read more. Absolved by Firm, Ex-Holland & Knight Partner Faces Ethics Case re Timekeeping After Matthew Farmer complained in 2005 that a fellow partner at Holland & Knight's Chicago office had allegedly added hours to a client's bill for work in a litigation matter that Farmer and others didn't actually perform, the law firm said Edward Ryan had done nothing wrong. Read more. Online Subpoena Program Now Available In-House Counsel Must Now Register With State Bar Ethics Committee Releases Opinion Regarding File Retention Arizona Court of Appeals Division One | Division Two December 23, 2008 - CV 08-0310 - Turken v. Gordon Do city payments to the developer of a shopping center violate the Gift Clause of the Arizona Constitution? Read opinion. December 31, 2008 - 2 CA-CR 2008-0035 - State of Arizona v. Steven Dwayne Szpyrka Was the statement "I got nothin' to say" an unambiguous invocation of a suspect's Fifth Amendment right to remain silent, obliging the detective to cease questioning immediately? Read opinion. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals December 31, 2008 - In the Matter of: Owens, No. 07-35634 Bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing debtor's bad-faith Chapter 11 case rather than converting it to Chapter 7. When deciding between dismissal and conversion under 11 U.S.C. section 1112(b), the court must consider the interests of all the creditors; here, the other creditors would fare worse under Chapter 7 because the accompanying discharge would deny them access to debtor's future income. Read opinion. December 30, 2008 - Gonzalez v. Duncan, No. 06-56523 A sentence of 28 years to life imprisonment under California's "Three Strikes" law violates the Eighth Amendment where: 1) the offense was Petitioner's failure to update his annual sex offender registration within five working days of his birthday; and 2) he was living at his registered address throughout the relevant time period. Habeas relief is warranted because the state court's application of the gross disproportionality principle was objectively unreasonable. Read opinion. |
The Complete Lawyer Lawyer Jobs Available Classifieds Legal Dictionary Legal Resources Expert and Consultant Directory Member Benefits AZ Supreme Court Opinions In which format would you like to receive this eNewsletter in the future, plain text or text w/graphics? Check the appropriate box
below: UNSUBSCRIBE You are receiving this message because the State Bar of Arizona believes you will benefit from this information. If you would like to unsubscribe to this mailing, please click here. |
|